Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Drawdown Thoroughly Discussed with U.S. Commanders in Iraq
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jim Garamone

Posted on 10/09/2007 4:19:53 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Oct. 9, 2007 – The British government’s decision to cut its forces in Iraq by half in the coming months has been thoroughly discussed with Multinational Force Iraq commanders and U.S. officials, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said here today.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown told Parliament on Oct. 8 that he would remove half of the 5,000-man British contribution in Iraq in the spring. British forces will continue to train and work with Iraqi security forces, Brown said.

The British troops are based in southern Iraq around Basra, the third-largest city in Iraq after Baghdad and Mosul. Britain has been the second-largest contributor of troops to Operation Iraqi Freedom. British troops helped spearhead the invasion in March 2003 and have commanded Multinational Division Southeast ever since.

“The United Kingdom has been a valuable partner in Iraq, contributing troops, diplomacy, finances and law enforcement expertise,” Whitman said. “The prime minister’s announcement of their projected drawdown is something that is well-coordinated with the Multinational Force in Iraq.

“With respect to whether or not any further adjustments need to be made on the ground will depend on whether the Iraqis can pick up the security mission in and around Basra. These are all tactical decisions that the Multinational Force and Multinational Corps commanders will make,” Whitman said.

Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said he doesn’t expect the transition of British troops to necessitate backfill by U.S. troops.

“I don’t think that’s the direction that (Multinational Force Iraq commander Army Gen. David H. Petraeus) is going in,” Morrell said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: discussed; drawdown; frwn; iraq; timetable; troopstrength; uktroops

1 posted on 10/09/2007 4:19:55 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketFR WAR NEWS! Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!


Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
2 posted on 10/09/2007 4:20:15 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Petraeus has things under control. Bump!


3 posted on 10/09/2007 5:58:22 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (PUT AMERICA AHEAD! VOTE FOR FRED!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

If the Brits withdraw and turn the area over to the Iraqis instead of Americans, we won’t read about it in the NYSlimes or the WA comPost. This has been the goal all along, and every day we (those of us who look) can find news about how Iraqis are gaining the capability to control their own country.

I’m for success in Iraq, even if the news has to be ignored until after the 2008 elections.


4 posted on 10/09/2007 7:51:49 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson