He came back in the next debate, with the famous “age and experience” quip, and won another FDR-esque landslide. But then again, he’d already won one landslide presidential election. Comparing FDT to Reagan is laughable. Everyone’s so impressed that FDT is a TV actor. Other than that, there’s nothing about him that’s impressive. Zip. Nada.
I think Fred has done very well in this debate. Some of the other, especially Romney, have stepped in it in a major way. But the debates do not decide elections. The fact that you think he is zip and nada means very little, especially when you cite no objective facts to back it up.