"That being said, if he continues with this insanity, he will surely get a true nightmare for president, one that will hand him his worst fears (3 more Ruth Ginsburgs?)."I find myself in a rather odd position here, as I find Dobson generally to be a nut and I find myself defending him today. Let's be honest and admit that the real issue concerning the next President is about USSC judges, not Iraq, and let's analyze what you said above.
1. If Hillary is President we will get more like Ginsburg for sure. More Democrats will slip into office on her train-tails also.
2. If Rudy is elected what guarantee do we have he will appoint another Scalia? The word of a politician? If we look at his track record of appointing judges in New York it shows a very scary precedent unless I'm mistaken.
If as many people sit out the election as the article suggests, Rudy isn't going to win. Even if he wins, he will still face a Democratic leadership in both houses of congress. Does anyone think he can appoint a Scalia or Alito type to the court? No serious person would believe that. So what would we gain with Rudy as President? He will be forced to appoint someone that the left can live with and the Pro-life crowd can't.
Of course I want to state that I have absolutely no clue who would agree to a 3rd party candidacy, but let's thinks a bit. Is there a Republican that satisfies the Pro Life crowd, the NRA crowd, the lower my taxes crowd and the Stop Illegals crowd? And if there is, why isn't he running right now?
Therefore, option #3: Some yet unknown, 3rd party person that is Pro-Life wins. Well, that's the proverbial mandate isn't it.