Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gscc

You are 100% correct! The answer is to not nominate Rudy, and I certainly plan to do what I can to see to it that he’w not the nominee. But if he is, he’s better than Hillary.

We know what kind of judges she would nominate and we know what kind of laws she wants. She’s a sure bet for the things we don’t want to have happen to our country. Even if Rudy is the lesser of two evils at least there’s a chance he would be better than Hillary in many areas.

Not a very encouraging thought is it? My prayer is that we will nominate someone else.


204 posted on 10/08/2007 9:20:21 PM PDT by jwparkerjr (Sigh . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: jwparkerjr
"The answer is to not nominate Rudy, and I certainly plan to do what I can to see to it that he’w not the nominee. But if he is, he’s better than Hillary."

Why? The only difference is Rudy wears pumps and fishnet stockings. Is this the best guy we can find to be the torch bearer for the Republican party? Thompson, Hunter and Huckabee are vastly more conservative than the cross-dresser. Yet our party seems determined to make Rudy the poster child for conservatism. If Rudy is the best we can come up with we are in serious trouble. A Rudy presidency will turn back the clock on conservatism in America for decades.

208 posted on 10/08/2007 9:47:05 PM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson