Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gscc
I would say that you may not believe Guiliani, that is your right, but if you were a betting man I can give you a sure bet that whoever Rudy would select would be a heck of a lot better than what Hillary would.

You are 100% guaranteed that she would elect someone whos first loyalty would be to Planned Parenthood. But with Rudy you at least have a chance that he would keep his promise to select Judges like Roberts and Alito. You would also have more political influence on him (same goes for any of the Republican nominees), where you will never ever have a seat at Hillarys table.

What you are doing by helping her get elected is loosing any minute chance of a voice at the Oval Office.

105 posted on 10/08/2007 7:18:06 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: codercpc

Let’s face it Souter and Stevens vote in lockstep with Ginsburg. They were nominated by Republicans - add O’Connor and Kennedy, fellow travelers. Won’t be fooled again.


150 posted on 10/08/2007 7:44:30 PM PDT by gscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson