Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
According to TexDOT, it would be cheaper to build an entirely new route than to expand the current highway outward, which would require buying out many established businesses.

"This part makes sense. Does anyone dispute that?"

~~~~~~~~~~

Yep. Most Texas highways run thru rural land, where this is not a consideration -- and the TTC route is already "looped around" the big urban areas where it applies.

32 posted on 10/08/2007 8:54:52 PM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: TXnMA

“Yep. Most Texas highways run thru rural land, where this is not a consideration — and the TTC route is already “looped around” the big urban areas where it applies.”

I wondered. Where I live there’s plenty of room along the interstates to add lanes, and as you say, the cities are looped with new six or more lane bypasses.


33 posted on 10/08/2007 9:01:31 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: TXnMA

“Most Texas highways run thru rural land”

NOT I-35!! Which is the key bottleneck.

“the TTC route is already “looped around” the big urban areas where it applies.”

yes, that is the point... it is rural because land is cheaper.


34 posted on 10/08/2007 10:09:10 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson