Skip to comments.
Great Britain: Anti-gay comments could cost you seven years in jail
The Daily Mail (U.K.) ^
| October 8, 2007
Posted on 10/08/2007 11:16:26 AM PDT by Stoat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: NeoCaveman
I suppose the thought process is that if you are homophobic, exposure to prison life will be akin to a total immersion course.
All kidding aside: this is a dangerous development in the extreme. The concept of "thought crime" - the criminalization of motive rather than actual wrongdoing - is tyrannical.
21
posted on
10/08/2007 11:37:08 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedoms.)
To: Stoat
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
It was Jack Straw who suggested that the moslem women not cover their faces when they had a meeting with him...
What came of that?
To: Stoat
There is no group, however small, that would not welcomeand nowadays will not agitate forimmunity from criticism and ridicule. Jack Straw and his speech-freezing lackeys ought to go whole hog and mandate that muzzles be used by all Britishers when walking about in public.
To: NeoCaveman
I don’t find it “funny” at all.
24
posted on
10/08/2007 11:39:20 AM PDT
by
darkangel82
(All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
To: AU72
So a Brit would have to think twice before he said, Im going out to smoke some fags.
25
posted on
10/08/2007 11:39:29 AM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: snarks_when_bored
Don’t say “whole hog”, you’ll offend the Muslims.
26
posted on
10/08/2007 11:39:58 AM PDT
by
darkangel82
(All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
To: bolobaby
There’s nothing “Great” about Britain anymore.
27
posted on
10/08/2007 11:40:07 AM PDT
by
Tully Pettigrew 1
(I used to care, but now I take a pill for that. ( Hunter /2008))
To: darkangel82
I’m glad you noticed that since I said it on purpose!
To: Stoat
So, that's the end of the once proud British.
That place is dead.
The Muslims will pick the corpse.
To: Stoat
Doesn’t the queen have the power to dissolve Parliament for this kind of idiocy?
30
posted on
10/08/2007 11:42:51 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
To: Stoat
Evidently things on Airstrip One have gone from bad to doubleplusungood.
31
posted on
10/08/2007 11:49:08 AM PDT
by
Argus
To: shankbear
Old episodes of The Benny Hills Show and Monty Python’s Flying Circus are now on the State’s ‘forbidden’ list I guess.
32
posted on
10/08/2007 11:49:11 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: andy58-in-nh
Orwell would still find plenty to write about Stalinism in the UK.
33
posted on
10/08/2007 11:50:15 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: Stoat
34
posted on
10/08/2007 11:50:40 AM PDT
by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: Centurion2000
Doesnt the queen have the power to dissolve Parliament for this kind of idiocy?The Monarchy Today Queen and State Queen and Government Queen in Parliament
"In addition to opening Parliament, only The Queen can summon Parliament, and prorogue (discontinue without dissolving it) or dissolve it.When a Prime Minister wishes to dissolve Parliament and call a general election, he or she is obliged to seek the permission of the Sovereign to do so. For this purpose, the Prime Minister usually travels to Buckingham Palace before announcing a general election. Since the Parliament Act of 1911, the life of the United Kingdom Parliament extends to five years, unless dissolved sooner by the Sovereign at the request of the Prime Minister.
In practice, except during the two World Wars when the life of Parliament was extended annually to avoid a wartime general election, every modern Parliament has been dissolved before its term has expired.
Parliament has not been dissolved by the Sovereign in person since 1818 (the Prince Regent was acting for George III), and is now invariably dissolved by Royal proclamation. This proclamation includes an order to summon the next Parliament and therefore sets in motion the machinery for holding a general election. The Prime Minister of the day may request the Sovereign to grant a dissolution at any time. In normal circumstances, when a single-party government enjoys a majority in the House of Commons, the Sovereign would not refuse, for the government would then resign and the Sovereign would be unable to find an alternative government capable of commanding the confidence of the Commons."
|
|
35
posted on
10/08/2007 11:52:12 AM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Glenn
To: Stoat
That is double plus ungood.
37
posted on
10/08/2007 11:53:45 AM PDT
by
BJClinton
(Don't taze me, bro!)
To: weegee
What is truly sobering (downright frightening, I think) about what is happening in Western Europe is the pincer movement advance of Stalinism on one side and radical Islam on the other. Where they meet will redefine the word “cataclysm”.
38
posted on
10/08/2007 11:56:01 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedoms.)
To: Stoat
I think gays are........... gay. There, I said it.
To: Stoat
So when will they be locking up the President of Iran?
Inquiring minds want to know......
40
posted on
10/08/2007 12:06:45 PM PDT
by
Robert357
(D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson