Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
It is, of course, of no particular concern why the did it, only that they did.

Obviously individual embargoes can be the fruit of wise policy or flawed policy.

However, that is of no concern to Ron Paul for whom embargoes in general are just a bad thing. He doesn't qualify his opposition to embargoes in any way.

Clearly the Founders had no objection to them in principle.

24 posted on 10/08/2007 10:34:18 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
He doesn't qualify his opposition to embargoes in any way.

So you say. I'll wait until I see the documentation to back that up, thank you.

99 posted on 10/08/2007 3:44:14 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson