To: wideawake
“They aren’t liable until a court finds them to be so.” *wideawake stomps his tiny little feet*
“This article certainly doesn’t establish liability, and I doubt you know much more about the case than what the article narrates.”
lol... close enough for me. The only question now is if they will do jail time or just lose their jobs?
186 posted on
10/08/2007 11:35:07 AM PDT by
monday
To: monday
lol... close enough for me. The only question now is if they will do jail time or just lose their jobs?Neither one. These are cops in NY. They can do no wrong by definition.
193 posted on
10/08/2007 11:41:40 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
To: monday
*wideawake stomps his tiny little feet*Bizarre way to admit you have no argument, but i'll take the admission anyway.
Neither will happen.
They didn't do anything criminal, and nothing described in the article equates to a firing offense.
We basically have a misidentification and an insensitive comment.
196 posted on
10/08/2007 11:42:36 AM PDT by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson