This issue is NOT about getting into the marriage business (or out).
This is about FORCING an edorsement of a sexual act. If it was just “a contract issue” then the homosexuals could have gone to their local Officedepot, Staples, or OfficeMax and bought the legally binding cohabitation agreement for $24.95. (free if you look online) This would allow two homosexuals to cohabitate without there needed ANY legal identification as to what they do in the bedroom.
Keep in mind the ONLY thing homosexuals are about is the sexual act. That is it.
Society rewards the institution not the individual. Marriage is a benefit to society’s future and it is rewarded with promotion and protections. Homosexuals do nothing to further society. They only self reward their hedonistic needs for sexual orgasm and attention.
Make no mistake, the topic at Bar Conventions bothh local and national IS about breakingn down marriage from the “breeders”.
Yes, that is the bottom line. Well-said!
I agree. The whole thing is not about marriage per se. It is about forced acceptance of a sexual persuasion.
I’m actually fine with gays ... don’t really care (or want to know) what they do in private. But I don’t want anyone to FORCE me to accept ANY private behavior on principle.
“Keep in mind the ONLY thing homosexuals are about is the sexual act. That is it.”
So true. I used to read a Conservative columnist, Andrew Sullivan, until I found out about five years ago that he is a homosexual (and totally unrepentant). And as can always be predicted, he turned against Bush as soon as he endorsed the Federal Marriage Amendment. No matter what a homosexual says are his political views, in the final analysis they decide based on their bedroom lifestyle - every time.