[avacado]

"Correction: Don't let Hillary or Giuliani in the White House as both are rabidly pro-abortion and would nominate judges that would uphold abortion rights."

If the choice comes down to the two, I'll take a Republican, i.e., Rudy. HillaryCare will have 100% federally funded abortions and I don't see Rudy doing that. And without at least a Republican in the WH, then good Conservatives like my Texas Congressman and Senators will be useless against something like Hillary.

[Ol' Sparky]

If you're a pro-lifer, you're foolish to even consider voting for someone as rabidly pro-abortion as Giuliani. You will have turned both parties into pro-abortion parties hostile to the right to life of the unborn.

Liberal Republicans ALWAYS do more damage than liberal Democrats in office. Giuliani can get liberal legislation passed that Republicans would filibuster to death.

A Giuliani Presidency would guarantee massive numbers of seats lost in Congress while a Hillary Presidency would likely return Republicans to the majority, possibly as quickly as 2010.

It's NOT possible to stop the advancement of liberalism by electing a liberal of either party to office.

[Grams A]

Hutchison is deserting us. We only have Cornyn left who generally continues to stand strong.