BTW, IIRC William Wilberforce spent nearly 50 years in Parliament, singlemindedly devoted to ending slavery and won as he lay dying. The abolition movement was even older here. In fact the RTL movement is second only to the abolition movement in seniority among serious movements. Roe vs. Wade is now 34+ years old not 40. And, lest I forget, you don't know what you are talking about.
You wouldn't be foaming like a rabid dog if you didn't think there was any chance of this idea catching on. Even your friend thought it had merit. You're just so whipped anything that threatens female privilege starts you screeching like a little girl.
Clearly, yours is a vivid fantasy life. You think I'm embarrassing MYself? All the posts we've traded and you have yet to counter my idea with anything but your "LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE" routine.
You've been repeatedly shown to be a liar and fabricator (yeah, a lawyer. who'da thought). And your "not real men" chesnuts might have worked back in the fifties, but the only people who take that seriously today are the benighted types that still haven't figured out you NEVER let the other guy hit you first, or females who have discovered the philosophical fly in their reproductive ointment.
Yeah, Wilberforce spent a long time opposing slavery. That's why all the history books record William Wilberforce as the guy that ended slavery before he died, right?
But oh, let me tell you...you scored big on my math gaffe. Only 34+ years, and not forty. What was I thinking?
Well, at least you didn't correct my spelling; I'd need to get a new screen name.