Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
Disagree. With this President we got two of the three Justices we need.

And the only reason we got them is because it ISN'T the three we need, but they sure laid the groundwork for refusing to confirm anyone that won't make a blanket promise not to touch Roe.

It's just another variation on the Rockefeller memo scam: "Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct..." then "launch an independent [fill in the blank] when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate ...."

They went along with the Supreme Court legislating from the bench when abortion was really considered bad, you think they are going to blanche at taking a dump on the Constitution again to keep it?

134 posted on 10/08/2007 5:44:19 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
The only way we'll get that third Justice is to have both the White House and Senate again. Had the Senate been majority Dem 2004-2006 we never would have gotten Alito and maybe not Roberts.

We kept telling the "teach 'em a lesson" crowd there are consequences to losing elections and one of them is we won't get the third Justice this term. You're right, a Dem Senate will never confirm a Roberts/Alito type nominee.

138 posted on 10/09/2007 9:12:53 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson