Do they or have they installed surveillance cameras inside the National Archives? If not, it might be a good idea.
But, with his top-secret clearance, he had access to all sorts of stuff, anyway.
I'd love to know what was destroyed. My guess is that the speculation is a lot more interesting than the actual substance. Probably was documentation just Clinton ditching some appointment to get a "Lewinsky" or some such nonsense. Given the Clinton camp's infatuation with style over substance, paperwork detailing something that made him look a "little" bad, would be much, much worse than something really important, such as selling nuclear secrets to the Chinese.