Type science frontiers anomolies into a search engine to see over 2000 entries, many of which could be used to argue against evolution theory. The truth really is out there, and with the internet so widely available, there is no excuse for blindly accepting the Evolution theory, which is a taxpayer supported belief system (religion.)
It is really amusing to see the lengths to which creationists will go to try to discredit the theory of evolution.
We are told that the theory of evolution is a religion, although it has none of the hallmarks of religion.
We are also told that ID is science, although it has all of the hallmarks of religion.
So, calling a science religion is supposed to denigrate that science. But calling religion a science is supposed to elevate that religion?
Especially when neither of these claims is true?
I guess this is what is called creation "science" -- something like the opposite of real science, eh?
(Didn't George Orwell have a term for that kind of language manipulation?)