Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Weirdad
There is more scientific evidence for palm reading, astrology, and phlogiston chemistry than there is for ID.

The reason for this is that ID is religious belief masquerading as science; on close examination the science evaporates and all you are left with is belief.

The whole sordid scheme is laid out in the Wedge Strategy.

There is even more detail in Dembski's Mere Creation. Here's a tidbit from Dembski's "Introduction" (p. 29):

Virtually every discipline and endeavor is presently under a naturalistic pall. To lift this pall will require a new generation of scholars and professionals who explicitly reject naturalism and consciously seek to understand the design God has placed in the world (see Bruce Chapman’s postscript in this volume). Theologians will have the task of taking up all these developments, formulating a coherent theology of nature that makes sense not only of God creating, sustaining and acting in the world but also of God incarnating himself in Jesus Christ.

(Hint: there is a lot of creation, faith and intelligent design, but no science to speak of in this book. It's the Wedge Strategy on steroids! What a joke! ID is clearly exposed as "mere religion.")
9 posted on 10/07/2007 5:55:21 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

And this relates to Professor Marks’ website troubles . . . how?


18 posted on 10/07/2007 7:57:43 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson