To: angkor
That was exactly the point of the post. A goverment cannot tolerate individuals (no matter how well-meaning) making decisions of this type.
If an individual feels conscience/duty-bound to do so anyway, then they must accept the cponsequences for having violated their oaths.
75 posted on
10/08/2007 1:58:26 PM PDT by
Androcles
(All your typos are belong to us)
To: Androcles
That was exactly the point of the post. A goverment cannot tolerate individuals (no matter how well-meaning) making decisions of this type. Sorry, I knew that's what you meant, don't know why my response came off the way it did.
I think it's that I was getting a little peeved at what these guys did.
77 posted on
10/08/2007 7:26:19 PM PDT by
angkor
("California, Is nice to the homeless, California, Supercool to the homeless..." South Park 11.07)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson