Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi
"The bill, as written, is not all that bad. It gets the states to implement computerization of criminal records"

The second ammendment says nothing about any exceptions, and the criminals that matter should be in jail. If they're not, they're unlikely to care about another law anyway. We cannot allow the creation of myriad criminal statutes have the potential to disarm people; we need all the gun owners that we can get.

"something neither group opposes."

And that is the saddest part of all. The second ammendment makes plain that all private guns are outside the purview of government.

71 posted on 10/07/2007 1:34:14 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
...we need all the gun owners that we can get.

Even if they are criminally insane?!

Look, I agree that we need to lock criminals away and take the mentally ill off the streets. The reality is that is not going to happen due to the cost and practicality.

Therefore, keeping illegal aliens, criminals and the mentally dangerous from purchasing firearms is prudent.

73 posted on 10/08/2007 4:25:42 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson