Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: disrgr; Diamond; Alamo-Girl; Dr. Eckleburg; metmom
From this side of the fence, however, guiding one's actions according to what one believe[s] will cause the most happiness and the least suffering is eminently more rational than guiding one's actions according to what one believes an invisible magician in the sky tells one to do. So I guess it's really just a matter of perspective, isn't it?

You want to talk about the "rational," do you disrgr? "Time to make it real -- compared to WHAT?"

The part you and your colleagues tend to obscure or forget is that man's reason, if unsupported by Logos, has no wind nor sea room. Man's reason is measured against the real conditions that obtain in nature -- universal, human, social -- that a competent sailor cannot obviate or disregard, if he means to survive the voyage. If you catch my drift.

By the way, I do not believe in "an invisible magician in the sky." I leave that sort of thing to Swift's Laputans.

Rather, in my experience God is not "an invisible magician in the sky," but a tangibly real living Presence.

167 posted on 10/10/2007 6:45:38 PM PDT by betty boop (Simplicity is the highest form of sophistication. -- Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
Well, Ms. Boop, I have to admit you lost me with this last post! :) I can only conclude that we have such widely divergent views on what constitutes "reason" that neither of us quite gets the gist of what the other is saying. It sounds for all the world to me as if you are asserting that what you personally believe in as reasonable/rational translates into a universal value--make that THE universal value--against which all people must be measured.

Whereas what I am saying is that every person--including/especially atheists--must decide for her/himself what is rational, and that for me at least, the Buddhist guideline of trying to do that which causes the most happiness and the least suffering is a pretty good yardstick.

I am puzzled by your reference to "surviv[ing] the voyage". Do you mean the "voyage" of life? Because obviously no one survives that. To what were you referring?

Also, if it's not too much trouble, would you mind elaborating on the "tangible" nature of your god? You're Christian, aren't you? In my 40+ years as a Christian I never found the Christian god to be tangible, and am very interested in the fact that you do. Or are we each using the same word to signify different things again?

Anyway, it's been an interesting discussion, and I thank you for it! May you be well and happy!

168 posted on 10/11/2007 7:29:47 AM PDT by disrgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson