[awakened]

I don’t think “fun” was in any way the issue — or choice — here. This is obviously a woman who wants her husband’s baby and cannot have it. She’s chosen the closest thing — genetically — without inbreeding and without adultery and surely without “fun.”

[mefistofelerevised]

I quess I’m too old. I don’t agree with this. It’s ok with cows, but not people.

[Republican Wildcat]

She’s chosen the closest thing — genetically — without inbreeding and without adultery and surely without “fun.”

Yes, I guess giving birth to your own husband's brother or sister is the next closest thing "genetically"...but really...it's a sad situation, no doubt, but does this really make the situation better, or add more problems down the road? There are ways they could still raise children without giving birth to a spouse's own siblings.