Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaryFromMichigan

It’s not far off from the Old Testament command for a man to marry his brother’s childless widow and raise up children for him - a sort of regrafting. And it makes sense from a material, evolutionary point of view. A son would carry the Y chromosome - the only guaranteed genetic inheritance through the generations is the Y chromosome in the male line, or the mitochondrial DNA in the maternal line.

Not that they are guaranteed a son. Not that it is right, or un-icky. But it makes a lot of sense.

Mrs VS


17 posted on 10/06/2007 6:31:05 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: VeritatisSplendor
Not that they are guaranteed a son.

Even a daughter would carry 50% of the father's genetics.

26 posted on 10/06/2007 7:56:10 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

It’s almost exactly what happened with Judah and Tamar (Genesis 38), except Judah didn’t quite realize what he was doing...


108 posted on 10/10/2007 3:06:05 PM PDT by MikeD (We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson