First off, the report is pre-Montebello, which she doesn't want you to know.
In her 3rd paragraph she uses a direct quote from the 1st paragraph of the executive summary, but she chops it in half, to suit her agenda. You notice that she doesn't link.
She wants a seat at the table.
Speaking of pre-Montebello, here are some interesting suggestions by Chris Sands. (especially the last sentence)
http://www.hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/montebello%20pr.pdf
She didn’t change the meaning of the quoted portion, but she’s the bad guy because she didn’t include, “and future arrangements for security against potential terrorist attacks on this continent”?
That’s just silly, BF. Terrorists are ALREADY HERE. And these are the same people who let them in. Sheesh.
And what’s the significance of the report being pre-Montebello? Did these globalists suddenly get religion at Montebello or something? Double sheesh.
No, she wants the table broken up for kindling.