Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Maybe you should read the thread.

No one here likes Guiliani; the question is, is the site willing to split with the Republican Party over it?

That is the “split” to which I refer.


114 posted on 10/05/2007 1:21:19 AM PDT by Soft Bigotry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Soft Bigotry

If you take FR as any indicator, there are three options:

A) Vote for Rudy or someone like him who does not have the blessing of the values voters.

B) Don’t vote because none of the Republicans are worthy of the vote.

C) Vote a hopeless third party candidate.

Any guesses as to which party wins given such a split among conservatives?


116 posted on 10/05/2007 1:23:55 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Soft Bigotry; All
Maybe you should read the thread.

No one here likes Guiliani; the question is, is the site willing to split with the Republican Party over it?

That is the “split” to which I refer.
~~~~~~~
Yes I read the thread,,,

This is what I referred to,,,:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts

Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

We’ve got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God’s existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children’s education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I’m going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

231 posted on 10/05/2007 2:54:59 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson