1 posted on
10/04/2007 7:59:47 PM PDT by
milestogo
To: milestogo
If it’s in the NYT, I guess it’s not to be believed.
2 posted on
10/04/2007 8:14:09 PM PDT by
DemEater
To: milestogo
Last semester I took a Polisci class and our moonbat professor showed us a PBS film called “Justice for Sell”. Basically it was a hit piece on Texas because the Doctors in Texas joined together and took the Texas courts away from the trial lawyers. It was pretty funny watching her try to convince us how evil doctors were for doing it. She would have had better luck trying to convince the walls then those of us taking the class that appointing judges was better than electing them.
3 posted on
10/04/2007 8:20:29 PM PDT by
txroadkill
( http://iraqstar.org)
To: milestogo
More doctors may not mean higher quality of care, but lack of doctors does hurt quality of care.
I’m glad the numbers are proving Prop 12 was the right idea.
4 posted on
10/04/2007 8:21:56 PM PDT by
tbw2
(Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" by Tamara Wilhite)
To: milestogo
The important thing to keep in mind is that the only kind of damages that were limited were non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. Actual damages including loss of income is still recoverable. So those stories in the NY Times about people being impoverished should be taken with a grain of salt.
What we need to do next is put a stop to class action suits. They are just a means to circumvent the standing requirement.
To: All
This is why I’m moving to Texas.
14 posted on
10/04/2007 9:14:55 PM PDT by
Ravi
To: milestogo
21 posted on
10/05/2007 10:20:46 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: milestogo
Now, if Texas could just figure out how to get the lawyers to leave...
26 posted on
10/06/2007 3:32:19 PM PDT by
Mamzelle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson