Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jen's Mom
....."We have plenty of pro-life candidates — today. What about yesterday?".....

I don't think I get your point? Bush is pro life, probably the most pro life president we've had in 40 years. Reagan was pro life. Bush 41 was at least not pro choice, probably just wanted to be "reasonable". Getting a pro life president isn't like getting a pro life king. If Bush could get a few Judges appointed, we would already have Roe turned over. Getting Rudy will definitely be no help. What you have is people voting for Bush for prez, and voting Dem for congress because they bring home the pork. Most elections are within the margin of error unless they are in "carved out" districts. If a abortion was voted on as a national referendum, it may not be turned over, but there would be severe restrictions on it.

Republicans like Spector, Chafe, Snow,and a few others is the problem. We had the power, we just didn't use it.

178 posted on 10/04/2007 11:23:59 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: chuckles
Fortunately I am not a one issue voter. I try to look at the big picture. Rudy isn't my first choice, but he would get my vote over any Democrat running.

Look outside the box...... It will be Hillary if the GOP splits and votes on the pro-life issue as their main qualifier for who they pull the lever for.

I think the war on terror should be the main issue in the next election. If Hillary gets in, we may not survive as a nation.

212 posted on 10/04/2007 11:48:04 AM PDT by Stars&StripesNE (Liberals are the enemy within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson