To: presidio9
hildebeast has too high of negative numbers to break 50%. 10% of Republicans were not for rootie... and they damn sure were not for hildebeast... so they represent Republicans like me that WILL NEVER VOTE FOR rootie. I guess rootie supporters had better wake up and smell the coffee... having said that... this poll is probably a skewed poll to help ‘toon with her momentum that is nonexistent!
LLS
21 posted on
10/04/2007 7:23:31 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: LibLieSlayer
I don't think it's skewed. It's right in line with almost every other poll, nationally or by state, that we've had: Hillary even or ahead of Rudy; Hillary beating Mitt or Fred by 5-10 points; and on state levels, some polls have Rudy winning OH, KY, a few other of the "must have" states; many have him losing slightly. Most have Fred or Mitt getting creamed.
All this can change, but it's not wise to always ignore the polls. That got us 2006.
45 posted on
10/04/2007 7:42:10 AM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LibLieSlayer; George W. Bush
The election is going to come down to who is hated more. If more Democrats hate Hildebeast more than Rudy then Rudy will win. If on the other hand, if more Republicans like you two, hate Rudy more than Hildebeast, then Hildebeast will win.
BTW, I am with you guys. I won’t vote for either of them either, but not because I hate Rudy. I just think he’s another socialist bozo who will say anything to get elected. Hildebeast I hate.
76 posted on
10/04/2007 11:26:44 AM PDT by
monday
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson