Going beyond that, I would call you a ONE ISSUE voter, with tunnel vision. Your position would result in the election of Hildebeast, who would appoint Supreme Court Justices like Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
I think you are wrong.
Actually, that would be the fault of those who insist on nominating Rudy. They know that there's no way a pro-life voter can go against God and approve of murder.
Knowing that, they then nominate an anti-life candidate. What do they expect to happen?
It is as if they are saying to us: "Just agree with us to murder our children, and we can win the presidency."
They can hardly expect us to agree to that. Personally, I don't see how any Christian can agree to that.
The blame will lie with the American people; with people who are willing to sacrifice their posterity on the altar of political expediency. Since many principled republicans will not vote for Rudy Giuliani under any circumstances, the blame for Hillary's election will be at the feet of those who chose expediency over principle.
George, is there any mountain that you would be willing to die upon? Is there nothing more important to you than winning?
First, "life" isn't an issue. It is a "right" enshrined in the basic documents of our Founding Fathers.
Without that "right" to life, no other rights or issues matter. You don't care if you're pro-gun if you've been murdered.
However, there are plenty of issues/reasons for opposing Rudy beyond the right to life.
He's anti-gun.
He's anti-family
He's anti-marriage
He's pro-illegal immigration
He's inexperienced.
He has a huge cesspool of personal problems that will doom him in this election.
He's marched with pro-gay activists in support of their causes.
He supports Federal Funding of abortion (focus on the forced Federal Funding of a controversial medical procedure.)
We could go on.