Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge bans TV station from running story (Banned in Boston)
Boston Herald ^ | Thursday, October 4, 2007 | By Jessica Heslam

Posted on 10/04/2007 12:53:39 AM PDT by ninonitti

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
The story which was banned in Boston was about 2 firemen whose autopsies showed that one was drunk and the other had cocaine and weed in his system.

IMO 10 years as Mumble's Consigliera should qualify her for an indictment not the bench

IIRC this judge also happens to be married to a retired FBI agent whose code name with the Bulger Gang was "Pipe" and who used to have Christmas envelopes passed to him by the boyos.

1 posted on 10/04/2007 12:53:43 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

Bless the Herald, printing truth for truth’s sake.

Damn the rest.


2 posted on 10/04/2007 1:01:51 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
"Merita"


3 posted on 10/04/2007 1:04:12 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

bttt


4 posted on 10/04/2007 1:04:19 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

Between this abomination, and Congressional Communists pushing hard to censor/control what is said on the radio, I have to ask just what the hell is happening in my country and what, if anything, is going to be done to stop it?


5 posted on 10/04/2007 1:07:30 AM PDT by frankiep (Insert clever quote here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
nothing about firemen will ever surprise me.

now i can say the same thing about judges.

6 posted on 10/04/2007 1:09:59 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
nothing about firemen will ever surprise me. now i can say the same thing about judges.

LOL try living in the Peoples Commonwealth for a while then nothing will suprise you except that it's so open around here.

7 posted on 10/04/2007 1:13:37 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

I’ve lived in the Boston area (now Boston proper) for almost all of my life, and no one outside this city seems to grasp how utterly corrupt it is. It’s the liberals’ town and as this story shows, they are not only unafraid about exercising their power in shocking ways, they’re arrogantly BLATANT about it because they know there will be no backlash. Mumbles is a disgrace and a boob—quite a combo!


8 posted on 10/04/2007 1:20:18 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist living in Boston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

She’s not exactly forthcoming here either:

http://www.mass.gov/courts/courtsandjudges/judgesandjudicialofficers/hopkinsm.html


9 posted on 10/04/2007 1:24:20 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Willard.....I mean Mitt do you have any regrets about any of your appointments as Governor?

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/04/27/romney_names_4_women_to_bench/


10 posted on 10/04/2007 1:26:46 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
"1989 decision by the state Supreme Judicial Court that said medical examiners’ autopsy reports are not public because they are medical records."

The judge is following the law.

11 posted on 10/04/2007 1:27:06 AM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
well, in 20 years when that town looks like detroit they'll know who to thank at least.

big dig kill anyone lately?

12 posted on 10/04/2007 1:27:42 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
The judge is following the law.

She maybe following the SJC but remember how often their rulings get overturned by the USSC by 9-0.

IIRC the story was based on interviews with individuals with knowledge of the case.

13 posted on 10/04/2007 1:36:01 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Sounds like Boston and their New England Patriots have a lot in common.


14 posted on 10/04/2007 1:39:20 AM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat
Sounds like Boston and their New England Patriots have a lot in common.

I wouldn't go that far. I was really outraged when I first heard about the "videotaping" thing, but when I heard the facts I was like "That's it--they used avideo cam instead of just taking notes?" Not exactly the same as a judge stopping freedom of the press. And the Pats are doing incredible so far this season, being the first team since 1920 to score so high in their first games, scoring each quarter.

15 posted on 10/04/2007 2:07:52 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist living in Boston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Socialism, thy name is Woman.


16 posted on 10/04/2007 2:13:34 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (There are NO gays in Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
big dig kill anyone lately?

Luckily no; but the state AG is now after a small adhesives manufacturer instead of the big engineering outfits and contractors who spec'd and installed the epoxy anchors.

17 posted on 10/04/2007 2:29:15 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Merita used to advertise The Lone Ranger television series waaaaaaay back. Does anyone else remember that? I was just a tiny child at that time. LOL!
18 posted on 10/04/2007 2:34:10 AM PDT by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
The judge is following the law.

That's an iffy claim. Prior restraint in the US is exceptionally rare, allowed by SCOTUS only when publishing information will put lives at risk. The analogy used by one SCOTUS opinion is publishing the movements of troop transports at sea.

In this case, the only risk is one of embarrassment -- and that wasn't enough to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers. If the records were illegally obtained, then the paper could be liable for that -- after the story is published.

19 posted on 10/04/2007 2:41:33 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat
Sounds like Boston and their New England Patriots have a lot in common.

Yeah right. Why don't you send this story to ESPN? Maybe they'll lead with it. /sarc
20 posted on 10/04/2007 3:02:47 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson