Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leatherneck_MT
“No person shall display the flag of the United Nations or any other national or international flag equal, above, or in a position of superior prominence or honor to, or in place of, the flag of the United States at any place within the United States or any Territory or possession thereof:

That makes no mention of “government offices”

The law says "should," not "shall." It's a recommendation made to everyone, but only binding on government offices (assuming the government chooses to make it so).

186 posted on 10/09/2007 10:47:03 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError

Courts have agreed:

A brief review of the display provisions of the Flag Code indicates that the statute was not intended [**20] to proscribe conduct. The Flag Code codifies various existing rules and customs pertaining to the display of the American flag “for the use of such civilians or civilian groups or organizations as may not be required to conform with regulations promulgated by one or more executive departments of the Government of the United States.” 36 U.S.C. § 173. The operative provisions of the statute consistently use the term “should,” and not “shall,” when describing the proper manner for display of the flag. See 36 U.S.C. §§ 174-76. Moreover, Congress attached no penalty provisions for noncompliance with the display provisions in sections 174-76.

Dimmitt v. Clearwater, 985 F.2d 1565, 1573 (11th Cir. 1993)

Not to justify flying the Mexican (or any other flag) over our flag, or take away from the importance of the illegal immigration issue, but it is not criminal to fly such a flag.


189 posted on 10/09/2007 11:06:34 AM PDT by Steelerfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson