Posted on 10/03/2007 11:51:59 AM PDT by doug from upland
I'll have to give them this. The conspiracy has been flawlessly executed. Hillary's ability to compromise all there branches of the government makes Watergate pale in comparison.
In May of 2005, Hillary's campaign finance chairman was acquitted in Federal District Court in Los Angeles. A big time DNC fixer attorney named Paul Sandler lead the Rosen defense. Who paid for that defense is going to be asked of David Rosen in his deposition for Paul v Clinton.
Prosecutor Peter Zeidenberg:
9 THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW IN THIS CASE, BEYOND A
10 REASONABLE DOUBT, THAT THE TRUE IN-KIND EXPENSES WAS #1.1
11 MILLION. HE UNDERREPORTED BY $700,000. IN OTHER WORDS, HE
12 REPORTED JUST UNDER ONE=THIRD OF THE TRUE COST.
13 NOW, AFTER THE EVENT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE FBI
14 BEGAN INVESTIGATING AND THEY BEGAN QUESTIONING PEOPLE. AND
15 DAVID ROSEN HAD A CONVERSATION WITH A WITNESS, WHO YOU WILL
16 HEAR FROM, AND HE TOLD THIS WITNESS THAT HE WASN'T WORRIED
17 HE SAID, IT'S THEIR WORD AGAINST OURS: PETER PAUL,
18 AARON TONKEN. THEY ARE LIARS. NO ONE WILL BELIEVE THEM OVER
19 ME. AND SO HE DECIDED TO RIDE IT OUT.
24 THIS CASE IS ABOUT ONE QUESTION, AND ONE QUESTION
25 ONLY: DID DAVID ROSEN DELIBERATELY CAUSE A FALSE FILING AND
1 STATEMENT TO BE MADE TO THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
2 CONCERNING THE IN-KIND DONATIONS MADE TO THE GALA ON
3 AUGUST 12TH, 2000
4 THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE WILL SHOW THE ANSWER TO
5 THAT QUESTION IS YES
======================
PAUL SANDLER:
6 NOW, AS THE JUDGE SAID, I AM PAUL SANDLER. I
7 REPRESENT DAVID ROSEN. I AM JOINED BY MY COUSIN JOE SANDLER
8 FROM WASHINGTON -- I AM FROM BALTIMORE -- AND MY FRIEND AND
9 CO-COUNSEL MICHAEL DOYEN FROM LOS ANGELES.
10 TOGETHER, WE WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU WHAT THIS CASE
11 IS REALLY ABOUT. IT'S ABOUT DAVID ROSEN'S FIGHT AGAINST THE
12 INJUSTICE OF HIS BEING WRONGFULLY ACCUSED OF SOMETHING HE
13 NEVER DID. I WILL PROVE TO YOU IN THIS CASE HE IS INNOCENT.
14 HE IS THE VICTIM, AN INNOCENT VICTIM, OF OTHER PEOPLE'S
15 MOTIVES, AND I WILL PROVE THIS. I WILL PROVE TO YOU THAT
16 DAVID ROSEN NEVER KNEW, NEVER KNEW THE COST OF THE PRODUCTION
17 AND CONCERT EXPENSES FOR THIS HOLLYWOOD GALA.
18 AND WHY DIDN'T HE KNOW IT, FOLKS? THE EVIDENCE
19 WILL SHOW HE DID NOT KNOW IT, BECAUUSE THOSE COSTS WERE
20 CONCEALED FROM HIM. THEY WERE HIDDEN FROM HIM BY TWO
21 INDIVIDUALS: PETER PAUL, WHO YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN, AND
22 AARON TONKEN. THESE INDIVIDUALS -- REPRESENTING A COMPANY
23 KNOWN AS STAN LEE MEDIA, THESE INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATED WITH
24 STAN LEE MEDIA IN UNDERWRITING, PAYING FOR THE COSTS OF THIS
25 EVENT, AND THEY HAD THEIR OWN AGENDA.
===========================================================================
This case was lost before even a word of evidence was heard. In the criminal case and pre-trial hearings, each side knows the evidence that is going to be presented. They know the witnesses.
Headline from the New York Times, May 9, 2005: POLITICAL DRAMA ABOUNDS, Rosen Defense to Argue He Was Duped by "Con Men"
That was the Rosen defense. Two bad guys lied to him and hid expenses. They were con men.
What did Clinton-appointed judge A. Howard Matz do? Before a word of evidence was heard, he said -- "This isn't a trial about Senator Clinton." "Senator Clinton has no stake in this trial as a party or principal." "She's not in the loop in any direct way, and that's something the jury will be told."
And then came the words that might as well have well been scripted by the defense and delivered to Matz to recite. He called Peter "a thoroughly discredited, corrupt individual. He's a con artist. The fact that he is, is already established."
The judge knew the defense was based on Rosen's contention that he was duped by con men. The judge told the jury that Peter was con artist and then some. He made the defense case for them before they had to say a word. Before trial, the prosecution told Peter there was a 60% chance he would testify. After what the judge said about him, his value as a witness, the most important witness of all, was worthless.
During the last day of trial, I saw, at various times, six members of the jury sleeping. They didn't want to hear about soft money and hard money. This was a Los Angeles jury. The jury pool in that city cannot even convict celebrity murderers.
Besides the collusion of the judge, there was much more at work here. The jury rightfully knew that Rosen could not pull this off alone. They were correct about that. The treasurer is charged with taking in the information, writing the report, signing it, and submitting it.
Was Rosen really responsible for a false invoice of $200,000 as the cost of Event 39? Testimony would indicate that he was. But that really doesn't get to the heart of the matter. The treasurer is responsible for the report. A third count was thrown out by the judge. That count had to do with the third false FEC report of July 30, 2001. By that time, Grossman and Hillary were well aware of the real costs. He was served in Peter's lawsuit on July 3, and Hillary was served through David Kendall on July 11. Included was documentation for $1.6 million spent by Peter.
Even though they had the documentation, Hillary allowed the treasurer to file the third false report. The third false report was never addressed in the trial. Why? Someone might have to mention the name Hillary Clinton.
There are so many layers to this case. As we discussed earlier, there was compelling testimony about Rosen having created for him a false invoice when he knew the cost of the concert was three times that amount. There was compelling evidence that he told people the cost of the event would not be the cost of the event and that he did not want to see receipts.
What was not discussed at trial and has never been discussed by the mainstream media are four important elements to the conspiracy:
1. A July 11, 2000 conference call
Participating in that call were Peter, Tonken, Rosen, Jim Levin, Wolfson, Terri New, and Hillary's agent, a White House employee and head of advance team, Kelly Craighead. In that conversation, Peter was directly solicited to pay for $525,000 of an event that they said would cost $1,050,000. Cynthia Gershman was supposed to pay the other half, but when she bailed out, Peter paid for the whole thing. Rosen was part of that call, yet in court he was less than candid about what he knew about the expenses.
2. A July 17 conference call caught on tape
Hillary is on tape thanking Peter, Stan Lee, and Tonken for what they are doing. She says that Kelly totally briefed her. She offered her help and said that Kelly would convey what she needed. Craighead has never been called to testify; not in the Rosen trial or before the FEC. She is an absolutely key witness whom Hillary has managed to keep from being under oath.
3. The statement by Hillary's official spokesman, Howard Wolfson, a few days after the Aug. 12 Gala
Wolfson acknowledged to the WASHPOST that the event cost a million dollars but that it was in-kind and not a check. No one has ever before asked how Wolfson knew it was a million dollar event. All those who participated in the conference call knew, including David Rosen. How could treasurer Grossman have been kept in the dark? The answer is that he wasn't kept in the dark.
4. A US Attorney withholding important evidence while official investigations proceeded.
This one is particularly egregious and frightening. Does Hillary have something on the US Attorney? Is the US Attorney a Hillary mole running interference for her? Why the important tape would be held until April of 2007, when it was critical evidence in investigations, should be the subject of a special prosecutor.
Hillary Clinton and Andrew Grossman should have been indicted. Instead, they indicted David Rosen. He might have been part of the conspiracy, but even the jury recognized that he could not do it alone.
We will continue to call this what it is --- THE GREATEST CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD IN U.S. HISTORY. It has been pulled off in broad daylight with the complicity of the FEC, the DOJ, a federal judge, a US Attorney, the Senate Ethics Committee, and a mainstream media ready to coronate Hillary. The greatest political conspiracy since Watergate, actually far greater than Watergate, wouldn't be happening if Woodward and Bernstein were still alive.
I commend you on your hard work and dedication to the truth about the wicked witch but I fear you may as well change your user name to don from quixote.
Great stuff, Doug. Except you should replace that last sentence with “would have been uncovered and prosecuted long ago had Hillary Clinton been a Republican.” Woodward and Bernstein are alive and well, they just have interest in investigating or exposing Democrat scandals.
Weren’t Woodward and Bernstein liberals out to hang a Republican President, or were they really unbiased? My faith in the liberal Democrat news media in all its glory hasn’t been rewarded up to this point. In fact, the liberal news media carried water for Bill all during the oral sex and lying under oath impeachment debacle - For some reason, the Clintons always come up smelling like roses with just these words, “We have done nothing wrong.” They apparently have no shame, and I doubt if the media would help nail them if either of them were standing over a body with a smoking gun.
I’m afraid we aren’t going to see justice done with the Clintons until, like Hitler, the whole world wakes up after the chaotic holocaust that only power mad people can cause. Witness September 11th, but even then, that was not enough. They owe too many of the wrong people too much.
MIDI - LOVE HURTS: http://www.geocities.com/Petsburgh/Park/1849/page3.html
She lied...defied...the truth they’d hide
Hillary...does things...illegally
To avoid her fall...some carried the ball
With a wink and nudge...compromised a judge
Judge Matz...Judge Matz
She’ll beat...defeat...she’s got to cheat
Dear Hillary...does things...illegally
To avoid her fall...some carried the ball
With a wink and nudge...compromised a judge
Judge Matz...Judge Matz
Some recall 1919...the Black Sox were on the scene
Did Matz have a grandfather who was part of that team
To avoid her fall...some carried the ball
With a wink and nudge...compromised a judge
Judge Matz...Judge Matz...Judge Matz
She’s doing what she must
With a wink and nudge...compromised a judge
Judge Matz...Judge Matz...Judge Matz
More excellence from
the Great DFU.
Thx BIG.
It “helps” of course, that the media serves and protects her - The trial, in the MSM, is deliberately ignored. But CNN can spend now days on her “laugh”
The prejudice in the judiciary is blatant, obvious, and overwhelming.
More later.
The biatch has made a pact with the devil. Nothing can stop that. This country is doomed.
I thought the last sentence was fine. It was done to mock Woodward and Bernstein. They both have info about this case.
What is the latest time-line.
Did Hillary & Co. appeal the latest ruling which included her in the suit or as a witness to be deposed?
One of two things is at play. The oral arguments might have caused the 3-judge panel to rethink their decision. Or, they are taking the full 90 days they have to stall for time. The lead judge was appointed by Gray Davis, who happens to be on the witness list.
5-page demand letter to Judge Matz - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1905221/posts
I hope you’re kidding but I fear you are right.
When she ran against Giuliani and he ended up with cancer, it scared the crap out of me.
ping
It seems that old habits never die when it comes to Hillary & Bill. Just do some checking into their past performances in Ark., you will see what I mean. She is so entrenched with NWO interests, she along with her husband have a lot to hide. There is ample evidence that the NWO interests love people like them primarily because they are so corrupt, and have done so many things on their own, that the NWO interests will have plenty to hold over their heads to get them to co-operate with their agenda. Why do you think that a no-name governor from Ark. suddenly got the nod and support via the Bilderbergers and CFR, and suddenly found himself prez of the dummy Corp? Do some checking, the banking scandal when he was first elected was just the tip of the iceburg. What is more scary is that now we will be potentially dealing with the real brains of the outfit.
In May of 2005, Hillary’s campaign finance chairman was acquitted in Federal District Court in Los Angeles. A big time DNC fixer attorney named Paul Sandler lead the Rosen defense. Who paid for that defense is going to be asked of David Rosen in his deposition for Paul v Clinton.
Latest News on Hillary Scandals
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=hillaryscandals
I don’t like to jump to conclusions over coincidences but it does seem like all her obstacles have a way of falling away...like the sea is parting for her.
She is so evil it’s easy to think she’s Satan’s choice.
I don’t like to jump to conclusions over coincidences but it does seem like all her obstacles have a way of falling away...like the sea is parting for her.
She is so evil it’s easy to think she’s Satan’s choice.
I don’t like to jump to conclusions over coincidences but it does seem like all her obstacles have a way of falling away...like the sea is parting for her.
She is so evil it’s easy to think she’s Satan’s choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.