I also get that idea like Hugh Hewitt has a vested interest in Romney winning. You may be right, maybe they’ve cooked up some sort of job for him if he is elected. I usually tend to agree with most points with Hugh but his trumpeting of Romney is a little disappointing. I heard on his show yesterday where he had Reagan’s assistant and they were both dismissing Fred as the real conservative and Mike Huckabee was their man if he could get into the top tier of candidates which is slim to none.
“I also get that idea like Hugh Hewitt has a vested interest in Romney winning. You may be right, maybe they’ve cooked up some sort of job for him if he is elected. I usually tend to agree with most points with Hugh but his trumpeting of Romney is a little disappointing. I heard on his show yesterday where he had Reagan’s assistant and they were both dismissing Fred as the real conservative and Mike Huckabee was their man if he could get into the top tier of candidates which is slim to none.”
If I knew how to quickly get to my first post on FR I would do it, because it was a criticism of Hugh Hewitt and him going Pollyannish during elections and just pushing his candidates with endless positive spin, regardless of facts. (If I remember correctly)
To a listener like me, that came to mean that he was useless for gaining any political insight from.
Re# 310 My point exactly. I still like Hugh (great interviewer and interviews) but listen with a very jaundiced ear...