Not only what you said, but what about free speech? It is all about the government restraining itself to not prevent free speech. Romney wants to LEAD the government, and he wants to infringe upon rights of free speech.
Plus Rush was talking about someone who was a phony soldier, not all true soldiers who oppose the war. Big difference.
The more I think about this, the more upset I get at Romney.
Is this the type of executive he would be? Maybe he needs an advisory council for every decision he makes and every pronouncement he makes.
Yes, I believe it would be. All the "executive experience" in the world means nothing if there's no direction behind it.