“Here’s what I’ll say as president: America seeks a world in which there are no nuclear weapons.”
And I guess he also forgot no guns along with it. Boy, is Obama trying to capture the Kucinich vote? Well, he might as well propose for the replacement of the Department of Defense with the Department of Peace, then Obama will get all of Kucinich’s supporters.
The only reason why we still need to keep Nuclear weapons is because what if North Korea or Iran gets Nukes? Besides, eliminating Nuclear weapons is no good because there are still people who can put together a Nuclear bomb. The only way to truly eliminate Nuclear weapons is to eliminate all knowledge of how to put together one and to eliminate the materials. Unfortunately to Peaceniks, this is entirely impossible because you would have to eliminate the Internet and every single Scientist (or anyone else with Knowledge) in the world. You might as well eliminate the human race to order to ensure a world with no nukes.
Sure, Ronald Reagan once proposed eliminating all the Nukes during a meeting with the Soviets, but he later knew that was a bit foolish. Still, Reagan was able to achieve something more realistic, arms reduction.
I don’t know who is more dangerous: Barrack Hussein Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, or John Edwards?
Apparently, Obama thinks North Korea already did. From the article: "India and Pakistan and North Korea have joined the club of nuclear-armed nations."
I thought we had determined that their little test last year was a failure, and that they do not yet have a nuclear capability. You'd think somebody that wants to be the leader of the free world would at least be up on the intel.