Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NY.SS-Bar9
Depending on who you believe, ethanol saves either an insignificant amount of energy or none at all. The energy required to produce and transport ethanol is roughly equivalent to the energy produced - no savings - just a big fat payday for ADM and corn belt farmers.

US Energy Department estimates ethanol production efficiency as 1.34 units of energy out for 1 unit in, with projections for improvements in both corn-based processes and biomass-based processes going as high as 2 to 1. This is hardly "no savings". See the link below.

Link here

34 posted on 10/02/2007 9:13:21 AM PDT by Cracker Jack (If it weren't for the democrats, republicans would be the worst thing in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Cracker Jack; RightWhale
RhightWhale:

If ethanol provides no net energy gain, how would it reduce dependence on foreign oil?

Cracker Jack:

Two independent studies (and I would NOT categorize the US government as independent in this case) have each come to the conclusion that ethanol production results in a net loss of energy. While some earlier studies suggesting a 70% loss have been debunked, the current consensus is that ethanol requires more energy to produce than it yields.

Ethanol costs more to produce than gasoline, yields less energy (which lowers your gas mileage) and competes for feed grains (bought steak lately?)

Ethanol can be made much more efficiently from sugar cane - but there is not a lot of domestic production.

57 posted on 10/02/2007 12:25:55 PM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson