“Being that energy independence is one of the top three most important issues facing the nation, ethanol is a step in the right direction.”
Not really, it requires subsidies, is land and food source intensive and barely breaks even on net energy production.
Nuclear energy, on the other hand, would immediately substitute for oil and coal usage.
where do you get that crap from?
the issue is liquid energy
ethanol cuts the filthy ragheads out of the deal
How do you figure that, when only 1.4% of US oil use is for electrical power generation?