Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Fred Plum's 1971 paper which coined the term "persistent vegetative state" was a speculative investigation of a certain type of head injury patient.

It was never intended to be put to the uses that legislatures and courts have crafted for it.

If it exists at all, it is a syndrome with varying causes and a diverse set of prognoses.

As a diagnostic category, it should probably be abolished, but it's too useful to politicians and judges for that to happen now.

10 posted on 10/01/2007 4:45:24 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

PVS, especially the term ‘vegetable’ should be abolished on moral grounds: It is an inherently dehumanizing term, as offensive as calling a race of people sub-humans or monkeys. Actually worse, as it is calling us to have less concern for humans than we do for domesticated animals.

No human being is a vegetable, and just as losing one’s limbs doesnt term a human into a worm, losing consciousness doesn’t turn a human into a cabbage.


20 posted on 10/01/2007 6:21:36 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson