Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RockinRight

“An 80/20 loan isn’t fraud in and of itself...did you think something else went on?”

The fraud was in using the second mortgage to avoid mortgage insurance. By the mid 1990s primary insurers were requiring buyers to have 20% equity in the property to avoid mortgage insurance. That meant YOU put in $1 for every $5 they lent you — not that you borrowed an additional dollar for every one they lent. Doing that might or might not have been outright fraud in 1999, but it was on the shady side. Deep in the shade.


77 posted on 10/02/2007 1:45:57 PM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: No Truce With Kings

That’s not fraud at all. I’ve been originating mortgages since 2001. As long as the first mortgage lender knows about it and their guidelines allow it, a 20% second mortgage is perfectly legitimate as a way around mortgage insurance. The interest rate on the second mortgage is higher as a function of higher risk.


78 posted on 10/02/2007 1:48:46 PM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson