[SJackson]

It becomes relevant when one starts and funds a “group” called jews4paul. In general hey are harmless, more than likely irrelevant. Other, of course, than to Paul. It does his campaign no good to have an individual with a cloudy background starting a group called jews4paul, when he could just as easily be starting Unitarians4paul or Quakers4paul. I appreciate you’re not doing it, but having a self described Jewish Unitarian Universalist Transhumanist Quaker heading a Jewish advocacy group is as foolish as looking for support on FR for a progressive dem. This doesn’t help the Paul campaign in the real world.

[George W. Bush]

It becomes relevant when one starts and funds a “group” called jews4paul. In general hey are harmless, more than likely irrelevant. Other, of course, than to Paul.

You presume that Ron Paul has control over all these various groups. Or that he has some interest in spending all his time chasing them away.

You don't expect other candidates to do this. And we all know every candidate in the field has a ton of odd supporters, way out of the mainstream.

But you never focus on any of them for some reason.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

It becomes relevant when one starts and funds a “group” called jews4paul.

You've been told a billion times that Paul has no connections to groups or individuals who use their own time and money to support him. There's no possible way that Paul can somehow be aware of everyone who's supporting him.

If Charles Manson supports Paul, that doesn't mean Paul supports murder and mayhem. The guilt-by-association deployed by you guys have gone from disingenuous to downright panic.