“Obviously the market could regulate health better than the government, and yes this solution would work: you have failed to show how it couldn’t, with all due respect, friend!”
Obviously? Really? You’ve presented nothing to substantiate the argument that no health service is better than a public health service. You try and show how that would work, ‘with all due respect’ of course.
And you ~Never~ really rebuted my arguments, with all due respect, Duke!
I find it very reasonable to say that in a market of freedom of information, and people’s reputations’ on the line, then they would gain more business by being healthy, unhealthy businesses would be shut down pretty quickly (because after even the “hint” of unsanitation in the perception of the general public) I would in a real free-market this would pretty much dry up the customer base; they would go out of business! We won’t ‘need’ the governmnet to ‘protect’ us. The “invisable” hand will do it for us; you compromisers need to re-read your adam smith and then Milton Friedman.