Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2
The poster is probably confused.

EternalVigilance is probably confused.
Bill Clinton is probably untrustworthy.
Osama bin Laden is probably vicious.

One puzzles as to whether any of the above statements is a trifle less obviously true than the other two.

326 posted on 10/01/2007 10:12:18 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b; EternalVigilance; NCSteve
If you mention Eternal Vigilance negatively, why wouldn't you show him the common courtesy of pinging him?

NCSteve has been baiting Eternal Vigilance because EV is well known to care passionately about Scripture and to strive to live with Scripture as his guide in life. If I were being baited like that, I would have no problem ignoring the bait.

Whatever anyone thinks that Scripture means, paleoPaulie is a despicably antiwar antiAmerican. Further he is a fake, phony and fraud in numerous respects cited too often to bother with yet again.

Eternal Vigilance is choosing a candidate this year who is not my own but his choice is quite understandable and even commendable given his premises and those of his candidate. Not even Mrs. Paul could justify any patriot voting for the moonbat that she married, even if she is into the shrimpin' bidness, trolleys, buses and nursing scholarships as well as fish sticks.

345 posted on 10/01/2007 3:54:30 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson