Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

It was through "due process of law" that RoevWade was enacted. The fetus was deemed to be a non-person by law. Executions are done using the same "due process" of the courts. It is a poorly formulated law. It was arrogant of the Court to presume to declare when life begins.

He knows the unborn child is a person, but refuses to grant that person Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment protections.

He has introduced various Bills in Congress attempting to do that very thing. It is the basis of his H.R. 1094: Sanctity of Life Act of 2007.

What candidate has tried to do more and why isn't the pro-life movement behind his latest effort?

288 posted on 09/30/2007 11:17:29 PM PDT by KDD (A nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: KDD

I don’t know how you’re missing the fact that Ron Paul wants the states to decide if persons in their jurisdiction are worthy of enjoying the right to life.


290 posted on 09/30/2007 11:22:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The Pledge For America's Revival" - Alan Keyes 2008 - www.AlanKeyes.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson