(((Wow)))
One more time, just for you pal. I didn't alleged that was in the link, ever, and I didn't post the link, and never argued against what your raving about.
Check above, the only thing I said was the link or what he said at the link regarding immigration was right on the money.
In any event, I gave you your dimes worth, and I'll do my best to avoid you in the future.
Have fun...
Is brazen lying your entire life; just a happy little online hobby; or are you a "special needs" adult? Your initial (failed) dodge, back at #131, begins with: "Yes, yes, but --"
Your "Yes, yes, but --" was, demonstrably, in response to my previous: "My honest and accurate assessment of the woefully inadequate mini-doc provided in posting #122 is that -- contrary to the bluntly stated assertion that it provided hard evidence that Ron Paul would "[ban] Muslims from coming here" -- it states no such thing; and that the original claim to the contrary was a pathetic, bald-faced lie."
That's the beautiful thing about message board arguments, you see, kiddo. They leave visible, immutable and easily-referenced "vapor trails," for all and sundry to read and enjoy. Your attempts at bluffing and blustering your way back to a crouched posture of quasi-respectability, therefore, are as pitiful and (ultimately) doomed as those of a sperm whale stubbornly attempting to glide its way safely down from the top of the Empire State Building.
In any event, I gave you your dimes worth, and I'll do my best to avoid you in the future.
It's okay. I'd probably scuttle back under the sink, too, under the circumstances.