To: dragnet2; Extremely Extreme Extremist; Allegra; Lead Moderator
My honest assessment of that document you're referring, that I just read from the link above, makes more sense than all 6 plus years of the Bush administrations immigration policies and his endless open border free for all. My honest and accurate assessment of the woefully inadequate mini-doc provided in posting #122 is that -- contrary to the bluntly stated assertion that it provided hard evidence that Ron Paul would "[ban] Muslims from coming here" -- it states no such thing; and that the original claim to the contrary was a pathetic, bald-faced lie.
That would make any claimant in this instance, by definition, liars.
129 posted on
09/30/2007 1:58:01 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
My honest assessment of that document you're referring, that I just read from the link above, makes more sense than all 6 plus years of the Bush administrations immigration policies and his endless open border free for all.
Yes, yes, but do you agree with this?
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
My honest and accurate assessment of the woefully inadequate mini-doc And I find it odd that you would label that statement a "Woefully inadequate mini-doc".
Would you prefer a 10,000 page government statement, made by 86 different government committees, that takes years to produce?
Hmmm.
I'd say his statement was, to the point, and right on the money.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson