Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: writmeister
“Dr. Dobson and his associates should announce who they would support for President and why they support them.”

Perhaps the man of their choosing is not yet in the running. And when their choice is on the scene, the remainder of the Republican Party may turn around and ask, “Why did we not tap men like this before (?) — why did we waste our time, energies and emotions on the current field?”

I don’t know that that will happen, but it certainly could. And that answers to the statement in the article that the Democratic Party will not compromise their principles (if you can call them principles!), but have forced the Republican Party to compromise THEIR principles. The Republican Party is the one being drug under in the social and moral arena.

45 posted on 09/30/2007 5:14:16 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: John Leland 1789; All; pissant

“Perhaps the man of their choosing is not yet in the running.”

I have never heard any reason for Dobson or any of the other leaders in the Christian community, for not putting their backing squarely behind Duncan Hunter. I can’t imagine that ‘electability’ or ‘poll numbers’ (the usual excuses) to be an issue if they are considering promoting a new candidate. has anyone heard of any legitimate reason why they aren’t 100% behind DH? He would seem an obvious choice.


54 posted on 09/30/2007 5:29:02 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Support Duncan Hunter in YOUR State....http://duncanhunter.meetup.com/1/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson