[Williams]

OK, read the whole story and of course it needs translation from NYT-ese. A LOT of people noticed Hilary's bizarre horselaugh at Chris Wallace, which seemed inappropriate because there was nothing funny, and it sounded like the revelation of some deep resentment at anyone who has ever criticized Clinton and her husband.

So the NYT "covers" (read "covers up") the story by mentioning the laugh at Chris Wallace, the worst one, waaaaay down in the story and developing an anti-Fox explanation.

They did use the word "weird" somewhere in the story, so they can say they covered all this when she goes totally bonkers in public one day. In the meantime, they have promulgated a "sarcastic sense of humor" explanation for the fact Hilary is angry, resentful, dismissive and superior toward anyone who dares challenge her.

[Amelia]

So the NYT "covers" (read "covers up") the story by mentioning the laugh at Chris Wallace, the worst one, waaaaay down in the story and developing an anti-Fox explanation.

Go look at the NYT editorial page for today. Several editorials that aren't very complimentary toward Hillary.