Creationists/IDers are ragging on SETI because they think they can get some mileage out of the “intelligent design” analogy.
***I don’t know why others are ragging on SETI, I’ve stated my reasons. If the evo crowd are such good scientists, then they’ll chase down some good science. But in the last few days I have been called “psychotic” for relying on the historicity of the best attested event in history. That ain’t good science. Here’s another area where I see some bad science.
Would you prefer stupid to psychotic? I'm just looking for the best fit. You obviously aren't ignorant.
You didn't exactly attract a swarm of defenders to your claim that the biographical details of Jesus' life (whichever details you choose) are better attested than the presidency of John Adams.