The leftist sear merchants are at it again.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Leftists are a remarkable group of scum suckers.
2 posted on
09/29/2007 1:42:13 PM PDT by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Time to drop an email to his office about ‘embarrassing’ himself.. everyone be sure to join in.
3 posted on
09/29/2007 1:43:25 PM PDT by
mnehring
(!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
As for me and my house, we will support Limbaugh.
Any questions?
4 posted on
09/29/2007 1:43:30 PM PDT by
davisfh
To: fkabuckeyesrule
The lie rolls on. Even this article doesn’t mention the context and that will be true from now on. Rush can defend himself but most folks won’t hear what he has to say. If the Republicans don’t stuff this down the throats of those pigs on the left they don’t have any balls left.
5 posted on
09/29/2007 1:44:01 PM PDT by
saganite
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Smear merchants.
Of course if liberals were to treat Rush the same way they treat other liberals when they say something then we should ONLY debate whether or not the person had the first amendment right to speak. And of course all criticisms of Limbaugh could be regarded as an attack on his patriotism. But I suspect they won't do that. Even I know that the first paragraph of this resolution is a total lie and another attempt to smear Limbaugh.
6 posted on
09/29/2007 1:44:01 PM PDT by
fkabuckeyesrule
(Revenge begins on December 22nd!!!!!)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
I’m glad that the Congress of the United States is focused on the important stuff.
7 posted on
09/29/2007 1:44:25 PM PDT by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: holdonnow; sono; rodguy911; anita; Bahbah; Clint N. Suhks; tiredoflaundry; defconw; Fudd Fan; ...
8 posted on
09/29/2007 1:45:05 PM PDT by
AliVeritas
("And set me down int he midst of the valley which was full of bones." Ezek. 37)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
What district does Udall represent, Colorados version of Rio Linde?
10 posted on
09/29/2007 1:46:53 PM PDT by
FMBass
("Now that I'm sober I watch a lot of news"- Garofalo from Coulter's "Treason")
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Is this payback for the Moveon ad resolution?
To: fkabuckeyesrule
12 posted on
09/29/2007 1:47:50 PM PDT by
freekitty
((May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.))
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Will they condemn the actions of Jesse Adam Macbeth?
To: fkabuckeyesrule
This is going to be fun....Rush will make them eat every word of filth they spew.
14 posted on
09/29/2007 1:48:27 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
("I fear we have woken a sleeping giant and filled her with a terrible resolve" - Osama 9-11-01?)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
the only time a leftist supports a soldier is when he’s a soldier in defiance of his command...
16 posted on
09/29/2007 1:48:39 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(life is like "a bad Saturday Night Live skit that is done in extremely bad taste.")
To: fkabuckeyesrule
To: fkabuckeyesrule
HSU, NORMAN
NEW YORK, NY 10012
BECAUSE.../DIRECTOR
UDALL, MARK E
VIA UDALL FOR COLORADO INC
06/25/2007 1000.00 27020290844
18 posted on
09/29/2007 1:49:53 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Dear Lord....
They are so desperate for ANYTHING to offset their “general Betray Us” PR damage that....well hey this is a stretch.
If the pubbies in the House had any gonads, doubtful, they’d be playing Rush morning report the same day he said about the “phony” soldier, when he was launching into those soldiers who lied while writing for the New Republic and the one that had never been in the army. Rush had a long diatrab on them which explains what he meant about that phony soldier remark.
It doesn’t much matter because trying to pin the liberal dislike of our military to Rush Limbaugh...heh. Nobody’s going to buy it.
The pubbies should use this occasion to do some damage to the left but they won’t. They never do.
19 posted on
09/29/2007 1:50:19 PM PDT by
Fishtalk
(http://patfish.blogspot.com)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Will this hurt Rush’s chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize?
20 posted on
09/29/2007 1:50:25 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
The govt should immediately pass a resolution forbidding resolutions against members of the media for things they disagree with. Since when does the United States Government try to sensor media figures by reprimanding them? This is out of the soviet union.
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Oh this is going to be good. Now the Republicans can bring up all the comments from member of the House itself who slanders and demeaned our troops fighting the war on terror.
If they are going to put Rush on the list there are going to be a hell of a lot of other names on that list too.
24 posted on
09/29/2007 1:52:16 PM PDT by
mware
(By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
26 posted on
09/29/2007 1:52:37 PM PDT by
txhurl
(Yes there were WMDs)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson