Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pawdoggie
Other than that, however, I'd have to say that the 4th Amendment (even as interpreted by pro-Abortion, politicized "Jurists") would trump Duck Hunter's political stunt.

Repeat ConLaw 101, you were sleeping the first time. Congress legislates not the bench. The 5th and 14th Amendments are quite clear, the life of "persons" are protected. If Congress defines persons to include the unborn, the distinguished oligarchy in robes would have no choice but to overturn Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton.

39 posted on 09/29/2007 12:04:02 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

The chances of Congress passing such a law, however, are less than zero.


41 posted on 09/29/2007 2:53:48 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson