Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett

Chess Master Bump


2 posted on 09/29/2007 8:10:52 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness ( Bumper sticker idea: Hillary/Obama Nation '08. Let the desolation begin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: small voice in the wilderness; John Jorsett
Pantsir-S1 self-propelled mobile system, each vehicle carries radar, two 30mm cannon and twelve Tunguska missiles. The missiles have a twenty kilometer range, the radar a 30 kilometer range. The missile can hit targets at up to 26,000 feet. The 30mm cannon is effective up to 10,000 feet. The vehicle carrying all this weighs 20 tons and has a crew of three.

Hep me out over here, please. This sounds to me more like a tactical anti-aircraft system, that fills in any gaps left by SAM Batteries. It also sounds particularly vulnerable to NOE missions. Russki doctrine used to be to have dense belts of short-range radar-directed 23, 37, and 57 MM in quick firing mobile mounts, which were pretty effective, even acquiring targets visually, the targets being driven to them by having to evade the SAMs and their longer-range radar. Directed by former Luftwaffe FLAK people from the DDR, the system was pretty damned effective in VietNam ... in reality it's own updated slanty-eyed version of the WWII Kammhuber Line.

So I reckon my question is, "What happened to the Syrian SAMs?" Isn't it logical to assume that we jammed up the SAM radar, leaving this Pantload System or whatever it is, to take on a mission that it was not designed to handle alone?

55 posted on 09/29/2007 10:55:45 AM PDT by Zerodown (Draft Petraeus. Let's win this one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson