Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen Beaten By Girlfriend's Dad Faces Sex Charge
WBZ-TV ^ | Sep 28, 2007 2:05 pm | staff

Posted on 09/29/2007 6:55:02 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

(AP) WEARE, N.H. First, a father was charged with beating up his daughter's boyfriend last week after learning the two had sex. Now, police are preparing to charge the boy with sexual assault.

The 17-year-old boy from Henniker, who admitted to having sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend, will "absolutely" be charged, police said.

Weare Detective Lou Chatel said the boy will be charged as an adult and could face up to a year in jail.

Both teens admitted to having sex during school hours on Sept. 10, but off school property, Chatel said. That afternoon, he said, the girl's father went to John Stark Regional High School and attacked the boy.

School had just let out and the parking lot was filled with students and parents.

The boy suffered cuts and bruises and received two stitches to his face. The father was charged with simple assault.

It all began that morning when the girl did not show up for her first class, even though she had been seen at school.

School officials searched the building, then put out a school-wide page. When the girl didn't respond, they called her parents.

Principal Michael Turmelle the parents helped search for their daughter, called her cell phone and coordinated with school officials.

The teens returned to school at the same time, through separate doors.

The principal said he's upset at the number of people who have sided with the father.

"We all work so hard to give our kids a safe place to go to," he said. "Any time we have an act of violence, it's very upsetting because it is completely antithetical to what we're trying to accomplish."

The girl and her siblings have transferred to another school, Turmelle said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: dads; daughters; publikskoolz; twotrashykids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-273 last
To: Dudoight

Me too. Take care.


261 posted on 10/02/2007 6:09:14 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Paulus

Yes, at times it is “acceptable behavior to use violence to achieve order through fear”.
In your Alan Alda wannabe world it is only acceptable to roll over on your back and piss on your own belly like a cur.


262 posted on 10/02/2007 6:13:32 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

at times it is “acceptable behavior to use violence to achieve order through fear”.

and you learned this at what mosque???


263 posted on 10/02/2007 6:31:50 AM PDT by Paulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

After reading the thread, I think it’s that NH has a rule that the age of consent is 16, not 18. He was over 16, she under.

I don’t know if they have any rules about proximity of ages, though, as some were suggesting.


264 posted on 10/02/2007 6:33:46 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Of course the principal takes no responsibility for losing track of the boy and girl—which provided the opportunity for the underage sex. But, hey, those kids had sex education.


265 posted on 10/02/2007 6:41:08 AM PDT by dooltotheend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ontap

Ah, the old one bad behavior justifies another bad behavior ploy. “But daddy so and so did it”. Does that have a juvenile ring to it?


266 posted on 10/02/2007 6:45:56 AM PDT by dooltotheend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Irrevelent argument. At least try thinking like a reasonably intelligent adult. By the way, thinking about doing something immoral, illegal or unethical is not a crime. Doing it is the crime.

Also, I never had sex with a girl younger than me or younger than 21. I dated my wife for four years. Believe it or not no sex until wedding night. I’m sure I would have if she let me. But it was important to her to wait. I loved her so I respected that. I guess that makes me an anachronym.


267 posted on 10/02/2007 6:55:54 AM PDT by dooltotheend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

You got that right!


268 posted on 10/02/2007 7:06:46 AM PDT by usslsm51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paulus

Mosque? LOL. No, Alan cur Alda, through life. There are so many examples of when violence is necessary that I don’t have time to list them all.
Here’s a saying that I read long ago. We sleep easy in our beds at night because rough men stand ready in the dark to do violence in our names. Or words to that effect. I realize Alan cur Alda that this is a horrifying reality for you and your limp wristed ilk, but it is a reality none the less.
No go watch Oprah.


269 posted on 10/02/2007 8:38:12 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

LOL. Since you cannot explain why it is acceptable for an adult to attack an adolescent without name calling or regurgitating what your Imam once said, I believe it is best to end our discussion. Be well.


270 posted on 10/02/2007 10:38:08 PM PDT by Paulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I do understand the girl's dad being upset. But to do this to any one, there is no cause for him to take matters into his own hands. He is not the JUDGE, JURY, AND THE ONE TO DISH OUT JUSTICE. We still have laws and a certain way to handle these things. However to charge this young man with a sex crime and as an adult, I would have to find the boy not guilty. This may chance if they were to charge the girl with the same set of charges. Both of these kid are not at the age of consent and therefore both need to face the same charges. I for one am sick and tired seeing the Male's in these case being the only one to face charges. If the boy is guilty then so is the girl. The boy did not hold a gun / knife, or anything else to the girl's body. When they both agree to have sex, then there both guilty of the same sex charges.
271 posted on 05/16/2011 1:10:03 AM PDT by brwilliam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

Is that all you can think of, is beating people up. Just fire this guy butt the same way that the HEAD MASTER needs to be done with up there in Conn.


272 posted on 05/16/2011 1:10:09 AM PDT by brwilliam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Then we would be having a complete stand-off as I would find the dad not only guilty of simple assault but also assault with intent to do body harm. In most states that is a class II felony and prison time for up to 10 yrs. The father has no business taking the law into own hands.
273 posted on 05/16/2011 1:10:17 AM PDT by brwilliam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-273 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson